His spinal decompression treatment of very good therapy for back pain? In theory, the distractive force applied to the low back by the traction is enough to create a negative pressure in the middle of intervertebral disc.
This negative pressure creates a vacuum that reduces pressure on sensitive nerves and allows for nutrients and water to enter the void. After the spinal decompression is completed, theory holds that replacing the void with liquid reduces the pain from vertebrae compression.
Because intervertebral discs are known to have poor circulation, the decompression increases the opportunity for it to take place. Theory holds that this can improve such problems as lower back pain, disc degeneration, sciatica, disc herniations, and disc bulges. It has been documented by patients who have tried other treatments unsuccessfully that it improved their condition.
Origination of Spinal Decompression Treatment
The original creator of spinal decompression treatment is a gentleman from Canada, Dr. Alan Dyer. This prototype was created back in the early 1990s and he claim to be pain-free after using it, this was known as the VAX-D table. This table utilized a pneumatic pump to apply and release lumbar traction.
In 2004, computer controls were placed into the tables and the pneumatic pumps were no longer necessary. There have been quite a few different tables created over the last 15 years, and they all utilize the same general theory of intermittent traction to create the negative pressure in the disk.
How Effective is Mechanical Spinal Decompression
As with anything that doesn't have a long history of use, there are conflicting views of how much good comes from the use of the Vax-D and other inventions of a similar type. One study shows better than a 68% success rate, but the results were on a very limited number of individuals. Other studies have not been nearly as conclusive.
In both 2004 and 2005, reviews of the Vax-D and other powered traction devices did not indicate that they were effective in treating lower back pain for any of the known causes.
In 2006 there was a study published looking at numerous years of spinal decompression for decades and showed that its effectiveness could not be proven. The report called for larger studies to hopefully show statistically significant effectiveness.
While some patients claim they have had vast improvements in their physical situations, the scientific community as a whole does not currently embrace this assumption. For those who have experienced an improved condition, it is promising that further studies will reveal more positive information.
Because the studies have inconclusive, the implementation of improved standards for measuring results is warranted since the anecdotal success rates have been so high with the treatment. Once larger studies show definitive results, insurance companies may be inclined to start covering the treatment.
This negative pressure creates a vacuum that reduces pressure on sensitive nerves and allows for nutrients and water to enter the void. After the spinal decompression is completed, theory holds that replacing the void with liquid reduces the pain from vertebrae compression.
Because intervertebral discs are known to have poor circulation, the decompression increases the opportunity for it to take place. Theory holds that this can improve such problems as lower back pain, disc degeneration, sciatica, disc herniations, and disc bulges. It has been documented by patients who have tried other treatments unsuccessfully that it improved their condition.
Origination of Spinal Decompression Treatment
The original creator of spinal decompression treatment is a gentleman from Canada, Dr. Alan Dyer. This prototype was created back in the early 1990s and he claim to be pain-free after using it, this was known as the VAX-D table. This table utilized a pneumatic pump to apply and release lumbar traction.
In 2004, computer controls were placed into the tables and the pneumatic pumps were no longer necessary. There have been quite a few different tables created over the last 15 years, and they all utilize the same general theory of intermittent traction to create the negative pressure in the disk.
How Effective is Mechanical Spinal Decompression
As with anything that doesn't have a long history of use, there are conflicting views of how much good comes from the use of the Vax-D and other inventions of a similar type. One study shows better than a 68% success rate, but the results were on a very limited number of individuals. Other studies have not been nearly as conclusive.
In both 2004 and 2005, reviews of the Vax-D and other powered traction devices did not indicate that they were effective in treating lower back pain for any of the known causes.
In 2006 there was a study published looking at numerous years of spinal decompression for decades and showed that its effectiveness could not be proven. The report called for larger studies to hopefully show statistically significant effectiveness.
While some patients claim they have had vast improvements in their physical situations, the scientific community as a whole does not currently embrace this assumption. For those who have experienced an improved condition, it is promising that further studies will reveal more positive information.
Because the studies have inconclusive, the implementation of improved standards for measuring results is warranted since the anecdotal success rates have been so high with the treatment. Once larger studies show definitive results, insurance companies may be inclined to start covering the treatment.
About the Author:
Want to find out more about pain doctors in Arizona, then visit Preferred Pain Center's site on how to choose the best Gilbert chiropractor for your needs.
